Thursday, June 21, 2012
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
It's been over a month since we came home...
It has been well over a month since I have been home.
So many thoughts about the trip in the intervening time. Here
is my download, still mixed up and a bit raw…
I have been sitting with how full and beautiful and hard the
experience of working with the women of the clinic was, and how totally blessed
we were by the home and nurturing environment our host Asia, and her family
made for us, and blessed by the learning that comes from being in another culture,
and blessed by the gorgeous warm sands and wide ocean and fruit trees and.... I’m
wondering why I felt so unsettled this time when I got home, since I have done
so much work overseas in the past. Why was this time so unsettling?
Certainly I am a growing and changing person myself. I am
continually more and more aware of the impact of my presence, the assumptions I
make about good work, continually learning from the many conversations I have
about racism and relationships and the dynamics of unearned privilege and
oppression, and thinking about what is authentic connection and what is just my
limited insular perspective. I am continually reminded that I am a guest and
witness in the lives of others, and that I have to wait to be invited in.
I think I have always had one-on-one translation services
whenever I have worked in an environment where I don’t know the language well,
and have been able to communicate with the women I touch (literally and
figuratively). I have learned through years of training (training myself and
training others), that communicating solely through face and touch, good
intentions and gestures makes a lot of assumptions about connection that are
often false. It silences others. Not to mention feeling completely ineffective
myself. I know when I am speaking a language that is not my native language,
how often I give up and don’t even try to say a more complex thought…
I also realize, I have never gone overseas with mostly US
students, I have always worked exclusively with students and health care
providers from the local communities in the countries I visit. It is a
completely different experience to bring outside students in. Completely
changes the purpose and dynamics of the trip and becomes exceedingly difficult
to stay clear about what we bring and how we maintain deep integrity, true
respect, etc.
I’ve just been asked, and have been asking myself as well,
if I would go again. Perhaps
in February. I have been thinking a lot about what that would look like and
what I would need (in addition to all of the truly amazing things that our
hosts and the community already provided and created for us) to make it sit
right with me.
Yes! I would love to go again. I would so like to see
everyone again already, and I believe for this program to have lasting meaning,
the foundation has to be long term, midwife to midwife relationships. I would
love to be a part of creating the space for further collaborating with the
local midwives and figuring out what that really means. I would love to
positively impact the infant and maternal mortality rates in Senegal, again
only if I am invited to do so, perhaps this time directly by the midwives and
the community. And then I wonder, are they in a position to say “no”? No you
are in the way, no, it makes more work for us, no, we can’t say no, because we
feel indebted and we need the supplies you bring. How would I really know what
is welcome or useful?
So this is what I have been thinking, none of which is
rocket science, and much of which comes from things I have learned from others (including
the students on this trip) as well as my prior experiences in clinical training
sites.
For us to have an authentic presence of respect and
sustainable contribution, we first of all cannot be competing for clinical
experience with the Senegalese students, taking away from their own hands-on
experience. That is a careful dance for sure. They are the ones who will stay
and are the hope for a changing face of health care in a real and permanent
way.
And- we need to have full time on-site translation services
in Wolof and French to communicate effectively, not only with the midwives and
Senegalese students, but of paramount importance to honestly ask the women
giving birth their authentic permission to have students "practice"
on their bodies. Is it even possible?
Lastly, bringing in students of color and having a higher level of experience in general in the student body, or else being really clear that green students would not get clinical experience beyond their level of experience. I've seen models where one student charts and assists, one student is the doula if needed by the birthing mom, and one student is more primary and catches the baby if skilled, and permission is given. I know tuition is what funds the program and other programs like it, as well as donations from others back home, and I know tuition is a barrier to anyone with a lower income…. So perhaps fundraising for scholarships as well.
One of our advanced students was doing a study project including interviews with the women involved in our trip. Her project was called something like "midwifery tourism in Senegal" and I asked her about the provocative term, since it implies voyeurism and consumerism of bodies. She talked about the book Obstructed Labor by Sheryl Nestel (a history and analysis of the move toward legalization of midwives in Ontario, Canada, and its intersection with racism and exclusion of women of color both as midwives and as clients by default. In the book there is a chapter on midwifery tourism, that while white women dominated these moves toward legalization and often deliberately, or perhaps sometimes unintentionally, marginalized immigrant midwives or midwives of color in the process, these same white women would go overseas to exotic "back-to-our-midwifery-roots-and-traditions" countries to "get their numbers" using women of color to further their own training and experiences). True, we do not need to look at Canada for more examples of this.
Lastly, bringing in students of color and having a higher level of experience in general in the student body, or else being really clear that green students would not get clinical experience beyond their level of experience. I've seen models where one student charts and assists, one student is the doula if needed by the birthing mom, and one student is more primary and catches the baby if skilled, and permission is given. I know tuition is what funds the program and other programs like it, as well as donations from others back home, and I know tuition is a barrier to anyone with a lower income…. So perhaps fundraising for scholarships as well.
One of our advanced students was doing a study project including interviews with the women involved in our trip. Her project was called something like "midwifery tourism in Senegal" and I asked her about the provocative term, since it implies voyeurism and consumerism of bodies. She talked about the book Obstructed Labor by Sheryl Nestel (a history and analysis of the move toward legalization of midwives in Ontario, Canada, and its intersection with racism and exclusion of women of color both as midwives and as clients by default. In the book there is a chapter on midwifery tourism, that while white women dominated these moves toward legalization and often deliberately, or perhaps sometimes unintentionally, marginalized immigrant midwives or midwives of color in the process, these same white women would go overseas to exotic "back-to-our-midwifery-roots-and-traditions" countries to "get their numbers" using women of color to further their own training and experiences). True, we do not need to look at Canada for more examples of this.
When I got home, in addition to going into surgery
(abdominal hernia), and beginning graduate school (MPH in Maternal Child Health)
I ordered and read this book. Thank you Megan for suggesting the book, and for
giving my shapeless dis-ease, the words to describe it. When we don't speak the
language, and when we expect women to allow largely untrained (mostly white) students
to do a vaginal exam on them while in labor, we are participating in racism. I
don't think it works to say these women are collectively willing, or that we
are "so good" that they of course want us there. Is it a service? Are
we doing good work? Sometimes. Maybe. Could we do better? I would hope so.
So? It never is easy. I am so committed to offering
midwifery training and creating models of appropriate and effective education, and
have never lost my belief and vision that this very low-tech and hands-on set
of skills, coupled with the fundamental belief in the ability and strength of
women giving birth, can save lives world wide. I am also committed to learning
from my dis-ease, and talking about race, class, privilege and oppression while
trying to find my way clumsily through as the white woman I am. I am working hard at staying mindful that I am a guest
and witness in the lives of others. Pictures to follow. Love, Marijke
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)